|
Sustainable Forestry
The First National Workshop on Sustainable Forestry
Wow… you’re one of 150 people from around the
country invited to attend the first National Workshop on Sustainable
Forestry! The day comes and you arrive in Washington DC. The
conference organizer hands you a notebook with several hundred
pages about something called the Montreal Indicators. The
U.S. is participating in an international forest health report
of this name. You look around the meeting room and read the
attendee list.
Whoops! Everyone else with only a few exceptions worked for
one of eight different government agencies. How did you get
here you ask yourself? You see the agenda and it is non-stop
meetings… small groups in two-hour segments from 8am
until 6pm with more meetings after dinner. Looks like it is
going to be a long three days.
One of the introductory speakers is Bruce Cabarle, Greenpeace,
who warns us about the ‘wall of wood’ that is
going to come at this country over the next ten to fifteen
years. He says all the tropical plantations begun about twenty
years ago will mature and be on the market.
There is a tremendous amount of data to discuss about America’s
forests and decisions about how to fill in gaps in the data.
There is good news about carbon data. Young trees use more
carbon dioxide than mature trees… much like young people
use more fuel. This is good for the environment and there
are a lot of young trees being planted in America.
When you return home you feel like locking the door, putting
on the headphones and tuning out the world. You know more
than you did and you realize how much more there is to learn.
You start to sympathize with your ancestors. What they must
have felt a hundred years ago when major areas of the countryside
had been cleared and the Forest Service had just been formed?
Today America’s forests are in good condition. There
is 70% of the forest cover that was here when Columbus landed.
Replanting is standard procedure. City governments require
tree planting in parking lots. Scientists across the nation
are funded to study rare forest plants and their medicinal
benefits. Foresters are concerned with the health of the forest
workers. If the people who work the forests aren’t taken
care of, the forests won’t be, they say.
I hope that by sharing my experience, you can feel some of
the energy in that group of foresters, scientists, policy
makers, real estate tax attorneys and consultants. They care
so much about our nation’s forests and about working
with other countries to share what works for us. The team
leaders for each of the indicators had spent their careers
collecting information and they shared openly what they knew
and where they needed help.
People from one part of the country could hear what another
part needed. A lot of collaborative efforts were formed in
those three days. Whereas I was initially disparaged over
whether I could add anything useful to such an elite group,
it turns out the river log ends offer historical fire data
for the South that was completely missing for much of the
1800s. We are now working with a forester from LSU to study
‘fire scars’ in these old logs and date the occurrence
of fires.
Here is a quote from Steverson Moffat, USDA Forest Service,
Southern Research Station in New Orleans. “The truly
fascinating thing about forestry in America, especially about
the South is that it’s 90 percent privately-owned. The
lion’s share is not industrial forest ownership, yet
we produce more wood fiber, more roundwood and more lumber
than any other place on the planet! We’re smart and
lucky to have a long, productive growing season, a resilient
landscape and trees well suited to the area. Now focused on
a broader definition including biodiversity, wildlife and
water, people are expanding out from the more narrow focus
of the 50s, 60s and 70s, sustainability of fiber and lumber.”
This meeting has given me even more optimism for our nation
and the world’s forests. Countries all over the world
are participating in this same project and others like it
for the opportunity to figure out how to roll up the data
into meaningful indicators. The 67 indicators in the Montreal
Process are classed into one of seven criteria for sustainable
forest management:
- Conservation of biological diversity
- Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems
- Maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality
- Conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources
- Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles
- Maintenance and enhancement of long-term multiple socio-economic
benefits to meet the needs of societies
- Legal, institutional and economic framework for forest conservation
and sustainable management
For more information sign onto www.mpci.org
.
|